缝水压力作用下坝踵裂缝动态应力强度因子分析

doi:10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2020.07.032

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 关于动载作用下混凝土重力坝坝踵裂缝水力劈裂的研究较少。应用扩展有限元法对缝水压力及地震作用下的重力坝坝踵裂缝进行动态数值模拟,使用相互作用积分方法求解裂尖应力强度因子,根据最大周向拉应力准则判断裂缝扩展情况。研究了加载过程中坝基与坝体的弹模比、缝内水压分布形式及初始裂缝长度对裂尖应力强度因子的影响,并模拟坝踵初始裂缝扩展过程。研究结果表明:当弹模比相差较大时,初始裂缝长度对裂缝扩展影响较大;而当坝基条件较差时,缝水压力是主要因素;弹模比是影响裂缝断裂特性的主要因素。坝体坝基界面初始裂缝在加载中呈周期性沿15°角斜向下扩展。数值模拟结果符合工程实际,可供研究重力坝界面断裂问题参考。

关键词: 应力强度因子, 坝踵裂缝, 重力坝, 缝水压力, 地震响应, 扩展有限元法

Abstract: The researches on hydraulic fracturing of concrete gravity dam heel crack under dynamic load are inadequate. In this paper, the extended finite element method was adopted to carry out the dynamic numerical simulation on crack in gravity dam heel under in-crack water pressure and earthquake action. The interaction integral method solved the stress intensity factor at the crack tip, and the crack propagation was judged according to the maximum circumferential tensile stress criterion. We studied the influence of the elastic modulus ratio of dam foundation to dam body, the distribution form of water pressure in the crack and the initial crack length on the stress intensity factor at the crack tip during the loading process, and simulated the initial crack propagation process of the dam heel. The results showed that when the elastic modulus ratio was quite different, the initial crack length was the main factor affecting the crack propagation. When the dam foundation conditions were poor, the in-crack water pressure was the main factor. Elastic modulus ratio was the main factor affecting fracture characteristics. The initial cracks at the dam body and dam foundation interface periodically spread downward along an angle of 15 degrees during loading. The numerical simulation results are in accordance with the engineering practice and can be used as a reference for study on interface fracture of gravity dams.

Key words: stress intensity factors, dam heel cracks, gravity dams, in-crack water pressure, seismic response, extended finite element method

胡良明，杨旭，贾欣，李姝钰. 缝水压力作用下坝踵裂缝动态应力强度因子分析 [J]. 人民长江, doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2020.07.032.

HU Liangming， YANG Xu， JIA Xin， LI Shuyu . Analysis on dynamic stress intensity factors of gravity dam heel cracks under in-crack water pressure[J]. , doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2020.07.032.

[1]	张萍朱安龙. 洪屏抽蓄电站重力坝坝基扬压力超标分析及处理[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(S1): 113-117.
[2]	徐强董金凯陈健云李静. 考虑接触问题的多边形有限元重力坝抗震断裂研究[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(8): 211-220.
[3]	万祥魏博文徐富刚张升. 融合小波阈值与多维自回归的时序预报模型研究[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(7): 203-209.
[4]	唐晓宇吕川黄诗渊. 支点摩擦对半圆弯曲试样应力强度因子影响研究[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(6): 186-193.
[5]	张宇;李黄河;王铭明;宋业传;. 寒区混凝土劣化对重力坝抗震性能影响研究[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(2): 171-176.
[6]	祖安君;黄晓丽. 考虑性态变化的重力坝变形安全多级预警指标拟定[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(11): 180-185.
[7]	吴伟伟，涂承义，刘西军. 高地震烈度重力坝坝基宽大断层处理设计[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(S2): 119-123.
[8]	李麒，朱光平. 基于SWT和SVR的重力坝变形预测研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(11): 169-174.
[9]	王瑞，刘金洋，周志辉，肖鸿，苗博泉. 乐元水库混凝土砌石重力坝优化设计[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(增刊I): 169-172.
[10]	武维毓，房国忠，魏樱，常亮，梁若霖. 基于数值仿真的大坝坝顶裂缝成因及危害性分析[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(S2): 270-274.
[11]	闫勇，郑付刚. 老挝色拉龙一级水电站重力坝深层抗滑稳定分析[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(S2): 98-103.
[12]	余侃柱. 川中红层地区混凝土重力坝建基面选择研究[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(11): 146-152.
[13]	陈皓，朱晓玲. 水库重力坝坝顶加高问题探讨[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(增刊I): 134-136.
[14]	王强,胡少伟,王阳. 不同龄期混凝土断裂试验研究[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(9): 91-97.
[15]	徐钟，邓辉，邓书金，涂国祥，万柯. 岩溶隧道涌突水形成机制及岩壁安全厚度研究[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(3): 61-66.

缝水压力作用下坝踵裂缝动态应力强度因子分析

Analysis on dynamic stress intensity factors of gravity dam heel cracks under in-crack water pressure

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价