人民长江 ›› 2021, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (12): 157-156.doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2021.12.024

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于实测资料的桥墩壅水计算经验公式比较研究

毛北平;钟艳红;肖潇;   

  • 发布日期:2022-01-10

Comparison of empirical calculation formulas for bridge pier backwater based on measured data

MAO Beiping, ZHONG Yanhong, XIAO Xiao   

  • Published:2022-01-10

摘要: 桥墩壅水对河道过流能力和水面线有一定的影响,因此对各种桥墩壅水公式进行分析,确定合理的经验公式是十分重要的。为分析桥墩壅水经验公式的合理性,根据汉江2017年10月实测的两次桥墩壅水资料,对几种常用的经验公式计算出的壅水高度和壅水长度进行比较分析。结果表明:Henderson公式计算误差最小为-0.023 m,误差百分比仅为12.1%,即Henderson公式与实际更为吻合;壅水长度的经验公式在高水时误差百分比仅为9.3%,相对低水时计算更为合理。

关键词: 桥墩;壅水;壅高值;经验公式;汉江;

Abstract: The backwater of bridge pier has a certain influence on the flow capacity and water surface profile of the river channel,so it is very important to analyze backwater formulas of bridge pier and determine a reasonable empirical formula. In order to analyze the rationality of empirical formulas,according to the data of bridge pier backwater of Hanjiang River two times measured in October 2017,this paper compared and analyzed the backwater height and backwater length calculated by several commonly used empirical formulas. The result showed that the Henderson formula had a minimum calculation error of-0. 023 m,and the error percentage was only 12. 1%,that is,the Henderson formula was more consistent with the actual situation. The error of the empirical formula of backwater length was only 9. 3% at high water level,which was more reasonable than that at low water level.

Key words: bridge pier; backwater; backwater height; empirical formula; Hanjiang River;