人民长江 ›› 2025, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4): 176-185.doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2025.04.024

• • 上一篇    

植被密度对工程陡坡径流水动力特性影响

李季孝,郭锐,谢淑度,徐小坤,吴光耀   

  • 收稿日期:2024-10-08 出版日期:2025-04-28 发布日期:2025-04-28

Impact of vegetation densities on hydrodynamic characteristics of runoff on engineering steep slopes

LI Jixiao,GUO Rui,XIE Shuyan,XU Xiaokun,WU Guangyao   

  • Received:2024-10-08 Online:2025-04-28 Published:2025-04-28

摘要: 为探索植被密度对工程陡坡径流水动力特性的影响,基于野外模拟降雨试验,以裸坡(Bare slope,BS)为对照,分析 3 种降雨强度下 2 种种植密度的百喜草(PF10:10 cmx10 cm,PF20:20 cmx20 cm)工程陡坡水动力特征及其与裸坡差异,揭示植被防护陡坡侵蚀的动力机制。结果表明:①裸坡和植被陡坡径流均属于层流(Re<100),但流态受不同降雨强度影响在缓流和急流间变化,PF10、PF20 削减平均雷诺数效益分别为 54.49% 和 5.95%,对平均弗劳德数削减效益分别为 41.69% 和 33.80%。②降雨强度不大于 1.5mm/min 时植被能降低流速,2.0mm/min 时 PF20 增大流速而 PF10 仍降低流速,PF10 削减平均流速效益是 PF20 的 1.98 倍。但两种密度植被均能显著提高径流阻力系数,其中 PF10 增大阻力系数效益是 PF20 的 1.47 倍。③PF10 削减平均径流剪切力和径流功率的效益分别为 23.06% 和 54.89%,而 PF20 削减平均径流功率效益为 9.79%,但增大了平均径流剪切力(增大幅度为 22.87%);径流功率作为表征陡坡侵蚀的最优水动力参数,PF20 和 PF10 的可蚀性分别是裸坡的 98.44% 和 48.43%。研究结果可为工程陡坡开展植被修复提供指导

关键词: 工程陡坡;水动力;植被密度;模拟降雨

Abstract: To explore the impact of vegetation density on hydrodynamic characteristics of runoff on engineering steep slopes, based on field simulated rainfall experiments, bare slopes (Bare slope,BS) were used as controls to analyze the hydrodynamic characteristics of two densities of Paspalum notatum Flugge (PF10:10 cm x 10 cm,PF20:20 cm x20 cm) under three rainfall intensities and their differences from bare slopes,revealing the dynamic mechanism of vegetation - protected steep slope erosion. The results showed that: ①Both bare slopes and vegetated steep slopes exhibited laminar flow (Reynolds number <100), but the flow pattern varied between slow and rapid flows depending on different rainfall intensities.PF10 and PF20 reduced the average Reynolds number by 54.49% and 5.95%, respectively,and reduced the average Froude number by 41.69% and 33.80%, respectively. ②When rainfall intensity was less than or equal to 1.5mm/min,vegetation reduced flow velocity,but at 2.0 mm/min,PF20 increased flow velocity while PF10 still reduced it. The benefit of PF10 in reducing average flow velocity was 1.98 times that of PF20. However,both densities of vegetation significantly increased the runoff resistance coefficient,with PF10 increasing the resistance coefficient by 1.47 times that of PF20. ③PF10 reduced the average runoff shear stress and runoff power by 23.06% and 54.89%, respectively,while PF20 reduced the average runoff power by 9.79% but increased the average runoff shear stress by 22.87%. From the aspect of runoff power,an optimal hydrodynamic parameter for characterizing steep slope erosion,the erodibility of PF20 and PF10 was 98.44% and 48.43% of that of the bare slope,respectively. The research results can provide scientific guidance for vegetation restoration on engineering steep slopes.

Key words: engineering steep slopes; hydrodynamics; vegetation density; simulated rainfall