具有复杂变形特征的倾倒变形岩体分带及稳定性

doi:10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2018.16.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 倾倒变形是河谷地区层状岩质边坡一种典型的变形破坏方式。星光三组倾倒变形岩体位于溪洛渡水电站库区，变形体范围内地层从寒武系筇竹寺组至志留系连续分布，碎屑岩与碳酸盐岩表现出复杂的倾倒变形特征。为全面评价变形体的稳定性，借鉴《水力发电工程地质勘察规范》，建立倾倒变形分带标准并确定各带的岩体质量级别；在此基础上，综合各类岩体的岩石室内试验成果和坝基岩体力学参数经验值，采用工程类比方法确定出各变形带不同岩性的物理力学参数；选取岸坡强变形区，运用极限平衡方法进行稳定性计算，其结果与蓄水后岸坡表现出的变形迹象吻合。研究结果对倾倒变形岩体的稳定性评价有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 倾倒变形, 变形特征, 变形分带, 稳定性分析, 溪洛渡水电站

Abstract: Toppling deformation is a typical deformation failure mode of layered rocky slopes in river valley. Xingguangsanzu toppling rock mass is located in the reservoir area of Xiluodu Hydropower Station. The strata of the toppling rock mass are distributed continuously from the Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation to the Silurian, and the clastic rocks and carbonate rocks show complex toppling deformation characteristics. In order to comprehensively evaluate the stability of the toppling rock mass, by referring to “Code for hydropower engineering geological investigation”, the toppling deformation zoning standard was established and the rock mass quality grade of various deformation zone was determined. Based on this, combined with various laboratory test results of rock and empirical value of dam foundation rock mechanics parameters, the physical and mechanical parameters of different lithology in various deformation zones were determined by engineering analogy method. Aiming at the strong deformed area of the toppling rock mass, the stability was calculated by the limit equilibrium method, and the results were in agreement with the signs of deformation after the water storage operation. The research can provide reference for stability evaluation of toppling deformed rock masses.

Key words: toppling deformation, deformation characteristics, deformation zoning, stability analysis, Xiluodu Hydropower Station

吴建川，张世殊，邹国庆，冉从彦. 具有复杂变形特征的倾倒变形岩体分带及稳定性[J]. 人民长江, doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2018.16.010.

WU Jianchuan, ZHANG Shishu, ZOU Guoqing, RAN Congyan. Zoning and stability analysis for toppling deformation rock mass with complex deformation characteristics[J]. , doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2018.16.010.

[1]	覃事河周全段斌靳玉鹏贾永代自勇. 大渡河林邦滑坡体工程治理措施及效果评价[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(S1): 77-81.
[2]	杜泽东;董先勇;秦蕾蕾;杨天冉;. 溪洛渡水电站坝下游河道非恒定流特性研究[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(1): 200-205.
[3]	刘冲平;肖云华;黄孝泉;董志宏;郝喜明. 乌东德电站地下厂房高边墙陡倾顺向岩体变形研究[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(S2): 59-63.
[4]	田仁斌;张承俊;苏纪成;陈晓龙;魏学锋. 离心式气密封在轴承油雾治理中的应用及流场分析[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(4): 215-220.
[5]	郑海益，崔慧斌，李仁江，赵小铭，蒋树. 溪洛渡水电站库区黄坪滑坡过程及成因分析[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(S1): 93-95.
[6]	华博深，石建舟，赵亮. 基于GNSS长基线的区域监测基准网设计[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(S1): 126-129.
[7]	周永健，冯文凯，吴卓林，易小宇，杨竞，顿佳伟. 溪洛渡库区星光三组岸坡倾倒变形成因机制分析[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(7): 108-114.
[8]	徐海洋，崔长武，张绍成. 溪洛渡水电站蓄水前后灰岩水文地质条件变化分析[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(6): 65-70.
[9]	姬升阳，毛延翩，刘志辉，邓国庆. 水轮发电机组螺栓应力在线测量与分析[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(5): 203-208.
[10]	屈新;徐兴倩;吕谦;娄高中;. “串层锚杆”加固的反倾层状岩质边坡稳定性分析[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(12): 115-114.
[11]	王林峰，何静，傅奕帆，唐红梅. 峡谷地区裸岩陡坡桥梁桩基筑岛施工技术研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(11): 141-145.
[12]	黄刚，肖洋，罗廷. 四川通江县袁家山滑坡特征与稳定性初步分析[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(S2): 75-78.
[13]	孙英，刘学. 煤质路堑边坡稳定性分析及设计优化[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(S2): 104-107.
[14]	李端有，叶斌，李波. 高拱坝水垫塘运行期监测成果分析——以溪洛渡水电站为例[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(S2): 329-333.
[15]	吴启凡，余琳，李雪，邵文强. 无人机航测技术在水库移民征迁安置中的应用[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(S2): 376-379.

具有复杂变形特征的倾倒变形岩体分带及稳定性

Zoning and stability analysis for toppling deformation rock mass with complex deformation characteristics

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价