河道采砂对赣江中下游水生态环境的影响研究

doi:10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.11.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究河道采砂对赣江中下游水生态环境的影响，于2017年9~11月对赣江中下游典型采区采砂作业时的水生态环境样品进行了采样，分析采砂扰动下赣江中下游水生态环境特征。结果表明：① 主要污染物为SS，TN和TP,其中TN背景浓度较高，采砂对水体理化指标的影响因采砂方式、采砂船数量、采砂船功率不同而不同，泵吸式采砂船对水生态环境的影响大于抓斗式。② 共检出浮游植物55种，浮游植物细胞密度为1.82×103~8.42×105 cells/L，平均细胞密度为1.29×105 cells/L，硅藻、隐藻为优势类群，南赣中13、栖龙Ⅱ等采区局部水域蓝藻比例较高。③ 采砂对浮游植物群落结构的影响主要表现为浮游植物种类和细胞密度的降低以及浮游植物优势类群和优势种的改变。

关键词: 浮游植物, 水生态环境, 采砂, 赣江中下游

Abstract: In order to study the impact of sand mining on the aquatic ecological environment, the samples of aquatic ecological environment in typical mining areas in the middle and lower reaches of the Ganjiang River were collected from September to November 2017. Results showed that: （1）the main pollutants in the middle and lower reaches of the Ganjiang River were SS, TN and TP, and the background concentration of TN was high. The influence of sand mining on environment was related to mining ways, numbers and the power of sand dredges. The influence of pump dredger on water ecological environment was greater than that of grab dredger.（2）55 species of phytoplankton were detected in the middle and lower reaches of the Ganjiang River, and the mean phytoplankton density was 1.29×105cells/L with the range from 1.82×103cells/L to 8.42×105cells/L. Diatoms and Cryptophyta were the dominant groups, Cyanobacteria dominated in some sand mining areas such as NG3 and QL. （3）Sand mining impacts on phytoplankton are reduction of phytoplankton in species and cell density and change in phytoplankton dominant population and species.

Key words: phytoplankton, aquatic ecological environment, sand mining, the middle and lower reaches of Ganjiang River

胡芳,刘聚涛,冯倩,温春云,万怡国,韩柳. 河道采砂对赣江中下游水生态环境的影响研究[J]. 人民长江, doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.11.010.

HU Fang, LIU Jutao, FENG Qian, WEN Chunyun, WAN Yiguo, HAN Liu. Impact of sand mining on aquatic ecological environment of middle and lower reaches of Ganjiang River[J]. , doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.11.010.

[1]	陈连军;邓瑞;邓志民;. 汉江流域水工程生态流量保障实践及思考[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(5): 101-105.
[2]	贲鹏;陆美凝;陆海田;彭亮;. 采砂对淮河蚌埠段河势稳定与防洪安全影响分析[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(3): 16-20.
[3]	张运林;张毅博;周永强;徐轩;施坤;. 生态文明建设以来长江中下游湖泊水生态环境变化[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(1): 14-23.
[4]	王艳;李兆欣;艾超坤. 南水北调亦庄调节池浮游植物时空变化分析[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(8): 65-69.
[5]	郭超;王玉;姚仕明;周银军. 长江干流河道采砂规划实施情况评估——以《长江上游干流宜宾以下河道采砂规划(2015～2019年)》为例[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(3): 8-12.
[6]	马方凯;陈英健;姜尚文. 长江三角洲区域水生态环境治理思考[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(2): 48-53.
[7]	钟艳红，岳红艳，姚仕明，朱诗好，赵占超. 湘江典型河段采砂活动对河道演变影响研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(8): 10-15.
[8]	樊宇奇，李文杰，戴卓，杨威，杨胜发. 长江上游洛碛航道采砂坑三维水温结构模拟研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(6): 160-166.
[9]	张启义，丁留谦，解家毕，姚秋玲. 采砂坑对南水北调中线工程渡槽安全运行的影响[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(11): 212-218.
[10]	刘定湘,樊霖,郭姝姝. 论河湖刑法保护制度之构建[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(8): 50-54.
[11]	郭超，姚仕明，肖敏，王军. 全国河道采砂管理存在的主要问题与对策分析[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(6): 1-4.
[12]	颜智博，夏细禾. 智能跟踪算法在采砂监管中的应用研究[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(6): 6-10.
[13]	左新宇，程帅，彭辉，徐浩，吕平毓. 基于P-IBI指数的大宁河生态健康度评价[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(6): 44-49.
[14]	贾海燕，徐建锋，雷俊山. 丹江口库湾浮游植物群落与环境因子关系研究[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(5): 52-58.
[15]	朱海涛，彭玉，柴元冰，张静，闵敏，陆丹，王英才. 黄河源区浮游植物群落特征研究[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(3): 84-87.

河道采砂对赣江中下游水生态环境的影响研究

Impact of sand mining on aquatic ecological environment of middle and lower reaches of Ganjiang River

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价