板间距对电絮凝处理微污染水的影响

doi:10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2017.21.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 电絮凝作为一种具有广泛应用前景的低廉高效污水处理技术，已经被证明在工业废水、生活污水等污染严重的水体处理上具有显著效果，但是目前对于电絮凝净化微污染水的相关研究较少。通过对电絮凝分批处理河水的实验研究，分析电絮凝方法处理微污染水的可行性，讨论极板间距的改变对电絮凝处理效果的影响。结果表明，电絮凝处理技术可以用于微污染水净化中，在电流密度为17.75 A/m2、极板间距为1.5 cm的条件下，反应30 min时，色度去除率为73.76%，浊度去除率为76.00%，悬浮固体去除率为85.71%，化学需氧量去除率为42.86%，总磷去除率为61.36%。在电絮凝反应中，极板间距对于微污染水的色度、浊度、悬浮固体和总磷去除效果具有明显的影响。

关键词: 电絮凝, 微污染水处理, 极板间距, 雨洪利用, 海绵城市

Abstract: As a low cost, high efficiency and broad perspective technology, electrocoagulation has been proved notable in the treatment of severely polluted industry water, domestic sewage etc. ,but the research for the treatment of slightly polluted water was less. Through test study on river waters that were in batch treatment by electrocoagulation, this paper analyzes the feasibility of slightly polluted water by electrocoagulation and discusses the influence of electrode distance change on the treatment effect. The results show that the electrocoagulation treatment technology can be used in the purification of slightly polluted water; under the current density of 17.75 A/m2, the electrode distance of 1.5 cm and 30 min of reaction time, the chrominance removal rate of polluted water is 73.76%, the removal rate of turbidity is 76%, the removal rate of suspended solids is 85.71%, the removal rate of COD is 42.86%, and the total phosphorus removal rate is 61.36%. In the electrocoagulation treatment, the distance between the electrodes has a significant effect on the color, turbidity, suspended solids and total phosphorus removal efficiency of micro-polluted water.

Key words: electrocoagulation, micro-polluted water treatment, electrode distance, storm-water utilization, sponge city

焦跃腾，顾正华，丁昊，周欣. 板间距对电絮凝处理微污染水的影响[J]. 人民长江, doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2017.21.005.

JIAO Yueteng，GU Zhenghua，DING Hao, ZHOU Xin. Research on influence of different electrode distances on treating slightly polluted water by electrocoagulation[J]. , doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2017.21.005.

[1]	殷书梅;龚莉;张翔. 快速城市化流域综合径流系数确定方法比较研究[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(8): 87-93.
[2]	黄诚;张晓祥;韩炜;刘昌军. 基于SWMM模型及GIS技术的城市雨洪调控情景模拟——以镇江市城区为例[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(4): 31-36.
[3]	李顺群;张光明;芮子航;刘小兰. 滤芯渗井-透水砖在海绵城市中的应用[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(11): 72-78.
[4]	吴京戎，姜金延. 基于DPSIR-EES和SD模型的海绵城市建设绩效评价[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(2): 54-59.
[5]	英战勇. 基于LID的城市道路雨水管控能力分析[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(增刊I): 1-5.
[6]	张盼盼. 基于CNKI的我国海绵城市研究文献计量分析[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(增刊I): 16-19.
[7]	孙波，谢水波，王志远，吴浩祎，刘慧. 基于多种LID模式的深圳市内涝防治研究[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(6): 17-22.
[8]	刘建，季舒平，黄绵松，李长超，赵瑞琪. 绿化植物在海绵城市中的作用及应用[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(增刊II): 35-41.
[9]	宋伟俊，张翔，付军恩，徐多，刘玲. 萍乡市海绵城市建设中的新技术运用[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(增刊I): 163-166.
[10]	张学弟，王宁. 城市建成区海绵城市建设的几点思考[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(12): 85-89.
[11]	刘晓东，杨党锋，蒋雅丽，苏锋，陈惠. 西安小寨海绵城市智慧管控系统研究与应用[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(增刊2): 300-303.
[12]	倪燕翎，王炳旭. 武汉市海绵城市试点建设现状及思考[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(3): 45-48.
[13]	杨珂，王思思，李海燕，车伍，赵扬，孙喆. 海绵城市建设中灌渠的保护与再利用—以北京市通州区为例[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(15): 25-29.
[14]	晏永刚,吴雯丽. 国内外典型海绵城市建设投融资制度比较及借鉴[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(14): 77-83.
[15]	里昂,王思思,吴文洪,袁冬海,李海燕. 海绵城市建设中水文化遗产保护策略研究[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(11): 14-18.

板间距对电絮凝处理微污染水的影响

Research on influence of different electrode distances on treating slightly polluted water by electrocoagulation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价