三峡水库中小洪水调度性能风险评估

doi:10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.09.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对三峡水库汛期中小洪水资源利用中存在的防洪、发电、库区地质、航运、汛末下游供水及蓄满风险问题，分析了中小洪水特性，建立了各类风险指示函数，提出了三峡水库中小洪水调度性能风险评估方法；同时，结合三峡水库汛期初步设计方案和2008~2017年中小洪水调度实践方案，对比分析了初步设计方案与调度实践方案中关于汛期中小洪水调度性能风险及调度运用过程年际间的变化情况。研究结果表明：2008~2017年的10 a间，相较于初步设计方案，调度实践方案使汛期发电量共增加了853.7亿kW·h；防洪风险由0.53%上升至54.51%，汛末下游供水风险由54.65%下降至14.65%，蓄满风险由50.00%下降至40.00%；发电、航运及库区地质风险变化不大。

关键词: 洪水调度性能, 中小洪水, 风险评估, 洪水资源利用, 三峡水库

Abstract: Flood resources utilization of medium and small floods during flood season in the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) bears potential risks, such as flood control, power generation, geological conditions in the reservoir area, navigation, downstream water supply and full storage risk during flood recession period. We analyzed characteristics of medium and small floods, established various risk indicating functions, and put forward risk assessment measures for flood dispatching performance; meanwhile, by comparing preliminary design scheme for TGR during flood season and 2008~2017 dispatching scheme for medium and small floods. We analyzed inter-annual variations in risk assessment of dispatching performance and its implementation. The results show that the 2008~2017 dispatching scheme helps increase power generation by 85.37 billion kW·h compared to the preliminary scheme; flood control risks rise from 0.53% to 54.51%, while risks in downstream water supplying decrease from 54.65% to 14.65%, and risk of having a full storage decreases from 50% to 40%, risk level for power generation, navigation and reservoir geological risk of reservoir areas remain about the same level.

Key words: flood dispatching performance, medium and small floods, risk assessment, flood resources utilization, Three Gorges Reservoir

杨震宇，付湘，孙昭华. 三峡水库中小洪水调度性能风险评估[J]. 人民长江, doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.09.006.

YANG Zhenyu，FU Xiang，SUN Zhaohua. Risk assessment of medium and small flood dispatching performance of Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. , doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.09.006.

[1]	许银山曾明裘诚胡挺. 2022年长江口压咸补淡调度实践及成效[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(8): 40-45.
[2]	熊凡李沛鸿袁逸敏吴峰. 基于GIS和组合赋权的城市洪涝灾害风险评估[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(8): 60-66.
[3]	郭生练李娜王俊梁志明. 华西秋雨与梅雨对三峡水库蓄水调度影响分析[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(7): 69-74.
[4]	毕月谢智龙彭聪聪温兆飞. 三峡水库重要河口岸线保护利用特征与对策[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(7): 37-46.
[5]	曹辉;陈柯兵;董炳江;. 基于Azure AutoML的泥沙预报模型构建与应用[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(4): 94-100.
[6]	丁炜;金有杰;张日;俞蕊;. 基于XGBoost的水库大坝基础设施潜在风险评估预测[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(4): 241-246.
[7]	刘晓阳;姚华明;张海荣;夏燕;赵建华;. 基于机器学习的三峡水库小时尺度坝前水位预测[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(2): 147-151.
[8]	梅梅;高歌;李莹;王国复;代潭龙;陈逸骁;. 1961～2022年长江流域高温干旱复合极端事件变化特征[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(2): 12-20.
[9]	袁青;于锦;熊齐欢;张子平;陈世豪;. 基于人工神经网络的隧道断层带突涌水风险评估[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(1): 140-144.
[10]	李臻;季民;李云岭;王映然;. 山东省干旱灾害风险评估与区划研究[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(1): 80-87.
[11]	芦磊;张斌;郑达;. 基于AHP-CRITIC的公路土质路堑边坡风险评估模型[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(1): 133-139.
[12]	龚文婷;李帅;胡挺;邢龙;王玮玉. 金沙江下游梯级及三峡水库消落次序研究[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(9): 187-194.
[13]	兰回归;李英海;李清清;孟虹池;杨苑. 基于改进萤火虫算法的水库多目标调度决策研究[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(9): 195-201.
[14]	李咏梅;孙治国;贾方方. 长江城汉河段深泓线演变对水沙异变的响应研究[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(8): 9-14.
[15]	程晓东;徐涛;冯志州;胡杨;徐杨;. 汛期三峡-葛洲坝两坝间船舶疏散应急调度研究[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(7): 8-12.

三峡水库中小洪水调度性能风险评估

Risk assessment of medium and small flood dispatching performance of Three Gorges Reservoir

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价